• All Posts
  • Application Development
  • Customer Success
  • Enterprise 2.0
  • News & Events
  • Product Updates
  • Tips & Tricks
  • March 2010

    Using Enterprise Microblogging for Sharing Links

    As children, our parents teach us to be kind and share with others. “Share your toys. Share your snacks. Share your games.” So shouldn’t we be expected to behave the same way when we grow up and join the business world?

    Unfortunately in competitive corporate environments, people sometimes horde information to try and gain any advantage they can over their colleagues. Thankfully, a cultural shift is occurring, where people understand that sharing and openness are vital to company-wide success, and that helping others is actually one of the key ways to getting ahead.

    This is the third part of a series explaining the benefits of microblogging in the enterprise. In part one, we took a look at how sharing status updates can lead to tighter knit teams and reduce duplication of work. In part two, we examined how affective microblogging can be for questions and answers, enabling everyone to benefit and contribute to knowledge sharing. Today, I’d like to highlight how enterprise microblogging can be used effectively to share links to information, from public websites as well as internal resources.

    When you read a blog post or news item online that you find informative, do you share it with others?? If so, how and with whom? If the only corporate tool at your disposal for sharing is email, do you really want to bother your colleagues by putting yet another message in their inbox? Will they even read it? What if there are other people that should know about the information? That’s where enterprise microblogging solutions, such as Socialtext Signals, come in, providing a better way to share information.

    Sharing links via microblogging, instead of e-mail, has several benefits

    1. Audience – Everyone in the company benefits from the information, not just a few people on an email recipient list. For example, you may think that article about a competitor will be interesting to the Marketing team, but the Engineering team could benefit from reading it as well.
    2. Discoverable – Via search, everyone can find links that have been shared, since they are not locked away inside someone’s mail file.
    3. Conversations – Often, when a link is shared, it sparks a discussion, leading to thoughts and ideas that let you improve products and services, or better satisfy customers.

    Each of these characteristics have lead to link sharing becoming one of the most popular uses of Twitter. According to a recent New York Times article, “(on Twitter) One-fifth of posts and 57 percent of repeat messages contain a link, proving that this is an increasingly popular way to spread news” – Dan Zarrella, Social Media Scientist.

    So what advantages does sharing links via internal microblogging provide versus using Twitter?

    1. 1) Privacy – Employees want to share information with each other easily, but not disclose it publicly. For example, if employees research a company for a possible acquisition and want to share lots of links about it, that must be kept confidential. The same goes for sharing information about your competitors. Also, people share intranet links with sensitive information and descriptions which must be kept internal, such as “Everyone please take a look at this list of questions from the Acme account.”
    2. 2) Expertise – Sharing links is not just about the content, it’s also about the people. Enterprise microblogging integrates with the corporate profiles of the authors, providing a great way to discover which people have expertise and interests in certain areas.
    3. 3) Integration – Rather than using multiple tools, content creation, link sharing, search, and profiles (mentioned above) should be integrated. Socialtext Signals features the unique ability to post a microblogging message automatically when a workspace page is updated. The resulting Signal (microblogging message) provides a link back to the page, and shows who made the update. Click on the person’s name or photo to see their profile. Go to the search bar in Socialtext, and find pages, people, and signals all from the same location.

    But what about social bookmarking?

    Sharing links is not a completely new idea. “Social bookmarking” sites, such as Digg and Delicious, have been around for a while. Some enterprise software vendors even offer dedicated internal social bookmarking tools. However, sharing bookmarks in their own unique location results in employees having to look in more places to find information. Instead, by sharing links via microblogging, employees now have a single experience for creating and discovering status updates, questions and answers, and shared links.

    So the next time you’re reading something that you think could benefit others, signal a link, and let everyone know.

    Here is a video of sharing links via Socialtext Signals.

    Using Enterprise Microblogging for Q&A

    In Star Trek, the crew of the Enterprise could get an answer to almost any question instantly, simply by asking the Computer out loud. While we’re not quite there yet, with countless websites, search engines, and social networks providing access to almost unlimited data, we’re pretty damn close.

    The problem is that while automated search results are helpful, they often provide more information that you can (or want to) process. So how do we filter through all the results to get the best answers? The solution often involves turning to people. We ask our friends and colleagues for their insight and opinions. For example, on Twitter and Facebook, many people ask questions to the network they’ve built, rather than “Googling” for the answer. If you need to know who sings a certain song, or where you can get a replacement battery for your Macbook, odds are someone in your community will quickly provide a response. The power of querying your friends led both Google and Microsoft to pay Twitter millions to add public tweets in the results of their massive search engines.

    As the use of question-and-answers over social technologies increases, businesses are looking at how they can provide similar services internally. That’s where a secure enterprise microblogging solution, such as Socialtext Signals, comes in handy. Signals allows colleagues to conduct Twitter-like Q&A, but do so internally, eliminating any concerns that company confidential information might be discussed in public.

    With Signals, you can ask questions openly to your colleagues in a private setting, and get informed answers quickly. This represents a huge departure from past technologies. In the past, if you had an HR-related question, you most likely would have sent an email to someone in the HR department, and that’s if you even knew the proper person to contact. Depending on the size of your company, you might spend 20 minutes first, just trying to identify who to reach out to. Microblogging works much differently. If you ask the same question openly via Signals, anyone in HR has the opportunity to respond, or you might even get an answer back from someone in Engineering or Sales, who recently had the same question and now knows the answer. Additionally, that conversation is now discoverable by everyone, rather than locked away in just your individual inbox.

    Similar to how social networks provide advantages over Googling, Q&A via Signals also has advantages versus standard intranet searches:

    • Search indexes don’t (yet!) contain the information inside our heads. I can’t search the company intranet for “Does anyone have connections with a graphic artist that could help us with our new website?” Being able to access the wealth of tactic knowledge from across the entire organization is incredibly valuable.
    • Search results don’t factor in the human traits like opinion and experience which your colleagues can provide. While automated results are quick and plentiful, they may not always provide the most useful information.
    • Search is only good when you know what you’re looking for. If I want to find “Who is the Sales Exec for the Acme account”, an intranet search will probably find that from a page or profile. But an intranet search won’t help much with “Does anyone remember the name of the company that launched last week saying their engine is 10% faster than ours?”

    As you can see, enterprise microblogging can empower your entire organization to help one another. Questions get answered faster, enabling people to spend more time on business tasks, rather than searching for information.

    Dachis Group and Socialtext Partner to Advance Dynamic Signals

    I’m in Austin at the Social Business Summit, where we just announced a partnership with the Dachis Group. Our initial focus is with their Dynamic Signals practice, driven by Jevon MacDonald, who blogged:

    The new Socialtext 4.0 is a great example of an out of the box Social Business Software that can be deployed quickly to enable signaling and collaboration within an organization. Socialtext’s support for Dynamic Signals and the ability to integrate external systems via a rich set of APIs has made Socialtext one of the most powerful and easily deployed solutions available.

    We have a long standing relationship with Headshift, the leading social software consultancy in Europe, which was acquired by the Dachis Group last Fall.

    “The Socialtext team are true pioneers in social business and E2.0, and their investment in product development means Socialtext has stayed consistently ahead of the curve in adopting new features such as activity streams, micro-blogging and social networking. Without doubt, Socialtext is one of the leading social business platforms available today.” – Lee Bryant, Managing Director, Europe

    Just as the Portal market drove the consolidation of enterprise search into a single command line, Socialtext and its partners will unify Activity Streams and Microblogging to cross-fertilize application silos. This is more than an IT strategy, and the expertise of the Dachis Group will prove a valuable partner for helping companies optimize their signal flow towards business goals.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Using Enterprise Microblogging for Status Updates

    Sharing Status Updates Reduces Duplication Of Work

    Last week I wrote Using Social Software To Accelerate Business Performance, as the introductory post to a new series where I’m going to discuss how “Enterprise 2.0″ tools provide benefits in the business world. I’m going to begin the series today by discussing the internal use of microblogging, which enables people to openly share short messages with their coworkers.

    For those of you unfamiliar with microblogging, the most widely known example is Twitter, where you enter “140-character or less” messages, press update, and essentially anyone in the world can read what you have to say. Notice that microblogging differs greatly from email and instant messaging, where the audience is limited, since you specifically choose who the recipients of an email or chat message are. With microblogging, the information is shared openly, enabling more people to read, and thus benefit from what is being shared.

    Internal microblogging provides companies similar benefits to services like Twitter, but adds a layer of privacy, by sharing the information only within your company. This enables you to provide status updates internally, which you would not share with the public. For example, you can mention customers, codenames, future projects, and other “internal-only” things.

    Socialtext provides internal microblogging via Socialtext Signals. With Signals, when someone posts a message, all their colleagues can read what is being shared. (In a future blog post I’ll explain how you can send signals to a subset of people using Groups) It important to point out that the content shared via Signals is searchable, so the information can be discovered by everyone at any time. Compare that to email, where a great deal of valuable knowledge is locked away in individual in-boxes, available only to the people that were listed on the To: and cc: lists.

    So let’s look at a specific example. This morning I signaled a status update “Generating a list of 2000 fake name, titles, phone numbers, and office locations for our new demo sandboxes.” I did not think much of it at the time. I was simply practicing what I preach, and openly sharing with my coworkers what I was doing. Much to my delight, an hour or so later (as seen below) one of my colleagues Graham, read what I wrote and replied with “Once you’ve got that list, could you send me a copy?”

    signals.png

    Now Graham does not work with me in Marketing. He’s one of our developers who happens to work on things like directories and LDAP. The 10 seconds it took me to share what I was doing, has now saved Graham hours of time duplicating the work. Multiply the time saving benefits of this one occurrence by the dozens of similar times that this happens each day, and then ask yourself “How can we afford to not be using microblogging inside our company?”

    Want more proof, take a moment and read about how St. Louis Public Radio is using Signals to openly share information. As station manager Tim Eby says: “People understand each other more, and they know what others are doing. This lets us respond more quickly to new opportunities.”

    Next up, I’m going to write about how you can use internal microblogging for questions and answers.

    Why Groups Matter

    Today Socialtext launched Socialtext 4.0, a significant step forward for our enterprise social software platform. One of the most important new capabilities we’ve introduced is Collaborative Groups, and I thought I would take a breather from press and analyst briefings to jot some thoughts down on why we think they are important.

    Groups in the enterprise are different from groups in public social networks

    Keep in mind that our goal is to help organizations become more effective – by releasing trapped knowledge, connecting people, and helping them collaborate to get work done. So our goal with groups is different from how a lot of group-type functionality shows up in places like Facebook or LinkedIn. A few of the key differences are:

    Some groups are related to org structure. Many larger organizations have groups that are formed from nodes on their directory tree. Socialtext People can be connected to corporate directories via LDAP or Active Directory, and our new Groups functionality leverages that capability.

    There’s a wide range of privacy needs for groups at work. There are two dimensions of privacy as they relate to groups in the enterprise – Discoverability and Membership. It’s just fine for many groups to be discoverable by any employee in the company – the golf club, a group of people with expertise in a certain discipline, or a task force working on a cross-functional initiative. Some of these may have open membership, while some may need approval. On the other hand, some groups need to not be publicly visible – for example a task force evaluating an acquisition target – in which case it needs to be completely private. We’ve always worked hard to design privacy into the foundation of our architecture; as a result our new Groups and related functionality preserves and leverages that multidimensional privacy spectrum. And remember that Socialtext has a uniquely flexible deployment option – a SaaS appliance that can be installed behind the firewall.

    Groups want to get work done. We’re enabling people not only create and form groups, but to provide and “personalize” the full range of Socialtext’s collaboration features (Signals, wiki workspaces, Dashboards, etc.) for the specific usage and goals of the group.

    Making it easy to form groups, but with appropriate administration

    Ross Mayfield wrote a great blog post talking about how “We’ve made group-forming ridiculously easy”. We’ve incorporated a lot of customer feedback into balancing the needs of IT Administrators to have some control while at the same time removing friction that makes it difficult for business people to create and form groups.

    Groups provide context

    Ever since we introduced Socialtext Signals, our secure enterprise microblogging capability, the deployment, adoption, and usage of it has grown rapidly. As Signals has been deployed enterprise-wide with great success, we immediately saw the opportunity to deepen the value by provide Signals Channels in conjunction with Groups. This makes it really easy for groups to take their discussions out of the fully public stream through a simple pull-down menu pick – note that people have been hacking this for awhile on Twitter using hashtags – except that everyone still sees them (remember the really annoying tweet flood last year during SXSW – oh no is that coming up again soon?) In Socialtext’s Signals Channels, the context is preserved for the people in those channels, and the signal-to-noise ration is improved for those who aren’t. Adina Levin wrote a great post expanding on this “The revival of groups in the age of the network”.

    Groups across the company boundary

    We’ve been supporting customers in B2B secure extranet use cases for years, and as we’ve added Signals and now Groups we’ve been thoughtful and careful to deal with the privacy and sharing issues that multiple extranets create. Maximizing sharing and transparency within the company while separating what is visible across and between different business partners is a hard problem, and I’m proud of some of the hard thinking and elegant solutions our team has come up with. If I’m a law firm, I clearly can’t have any leakage of information going on between my clients, or between what one team in my firm is doing with Client A and another team is doing with Client B – and moreover I probably don’t want either client to know the identity of my other clients. We’ve tackled some pretty complex situations throughout our company evolution and we’re lucky to be able to build on our past experience and the architecture has evolved through that experience. Some highly visible privacy mis-steps by some other vendors recently just highlight the importance and difficulty of these problems.

    Groups are all about people

    My “Business is Conducted by People, not Users” post described how important People are to our way of thinking. Socialtext 4.0 is just another major step forward in putting people front and center – making it easy for them to find each other, create groups and teams, and then marshall the collaborative resources to help them get stuff done. I’m super proud of the Socialtext team in delivering this milestone, and we’re blessed to have great customers who’ve helped us design, refine, and deliver this major release.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Socialtext 4.0 – Using groups and networks together

    In a recent blog post, internet thought leader David Weinberger writes about how networks have surpassed groups in recent years, as ways of defining social connections online. “In the past decade, we’ve gone from talking about social circles to social network. A circle draws lines around us. Networks draw lines among us.” Social network messaging, where communication centers around the individual user (such Facebook and Twitter), have rocketed to prominence, far ahead of group-based tools (such as found in Yahoo Groups and Google Groups, other age-old forums, and special-purpose tools such as MeetUp).

    Weinberger implies that groups are obsolescent: “(Yet more evidence — as if we needed it — that networks are the new paradigm. Bye bye, Information Age!)” Networks are more visible and addressible now, but I don’t see groups becoming obsolete. As networks grow, groups are poised for a major comeback, as a way of expressing context within networks.

    Scale and context

    One of the reasons that social messaging networks have surpassed group forums is that networks scale around the individual. When you join a group, the level of noise depends mostly on other people – when the place gets too popular, the experience degrades for individuals. In a network, each person controls who they friend and follow, and this puts the limit under the control of the individual.

    But network traffic eventually gets overwhelming too. The number of people to friend and follow is under your control, but subject to social pressure and information greed – like chocolate you can get too much of a good thing. Keep adding friends, followers, and eventually there is too much information and not enough context.

    The solution to too much information is more context. As Clay Shirky says, there is no such thing as information overload, only filter failure. One of the most important ways of filtering is adding context. Context helps people focus on who and what they care about it, when they care about.

    Groups and shared identity

    Groups help people express shared identity. Now a social context doesn’t require a defined group. Social context is shaped by people’s interactions and mutually recognized signs of affiliation, not by defined membership. In an open network such Twitter, social ties can be inferred from patterns of tag use and replies; networks of replies and posters to a common tag become familiar faces. For example, on Twitter, I’ve recently stumbled upon an informal network of Icelandic musicians and their fans. But people often seek persistent affiliation, recognition, and communication in groups. In the workplace, people gather around shared interests, such as guitar playing, cycling, and kite sailing, to name three examples among Socialtext’s customers.

    Groups and action

    Groups are handy for affiliation and shared identity; they are necessary for sustained action. Networks can be very effective for ad hoc action. Think about the way that the call for donations to help with Haiti emergency response spread rapidly on Facebook and Twitter. But to coordinate action over time, you need ongoing communication and longer sequences of actions. In open source software development, the classic model of self-organized coordinated action in the internet age, a new project sets up a code repository, mailing list/forum, a wiki, and an IRC channel for ad hoc synchronous communication. The basic toolset for coordination includes group collaboration. The best practices in internet self-organization allow for increasing levels of organization, starting at a very lightweight level, where participants can read information, start to ask questions, and make small contributions, on to very high levels of dedicated contributions. By enabling groups to form within larger networks, people get the benefits of a larger network, with more manageable, lightweight communication, while also being able to communicate and collaborate more deeply with a set of people with shared interests and goals.

    Focus, not privacy

    Often people consider the topic of social sharing in terms of “privacy”. The information overload symptom of “oversharing” is seen as a privacy problem. As Stowe Boyd and others observe, the issue of oversharing not primarily about information should be kept hidden, and much more about who to share with in what context. Even if you don’t care who knows who else knows your workout routine, fellow fans of rowing or weight-lifting might care more than other friends and colleagues. Groups frequently aren’t private – in fact, they are more useful for many purposes if potential participants can easily find them, look around to see what’s going on, and join if they are interested. FriendFeed groups were quite popular among scientists and journalists online. Most of these groups were publically listed. Users could choose to join them. Another convenient setup is groups where a member can request to join, and a moderator needs to approve applications. In most cases, the goal of a group isn’t to keep information secret – it’s to allow people to affiliate, to collaborate. And to focus their attention and communication within these defined social contexts.

    Groups and networks – summary

    In summary, I don’t think it’s true that the rise of networks is going to wash away groups. Groups and networks are complementary. Networks help people get to know other individuals, and to manage attention by constraining the number of people to follow. Groups help people focus attention, share identity, and collaborate more deeply within networks. As ReadWriteWeb describes, a big part of the solution to information overload is increased context. And groups are key to re-establishing context in the network era. As Stowe Boyd and Adrian Chan remind us, identity is socially constructed in social context.

    How General Motors Uses Socialtext for Its R&D

    General Motors’ Research & Development has a global network of research centers and science & technology offices. One of the ways the research staff shares their work with colleagues is through a semi-annual forum. It provides researchers with the opportunity to interact face-to-face or virtually, using audio/web teleconferencing and a file management system. But due to the geographic distribution of GM R&D, it results in some attending the forum early in the morning or late at night.

    To address the difficulty in getting researchers to interact with each other at the semi-annual forum, GM turned to Socialtext to provide a central, secure place where this research can be shared openly among the GM research community — and where it is searchable and discoverable.

    “We are building a virtual forum site with Socialtext,” John Suh, a Staff Researcher at the GM Advanced Technology Silicon Valley Office, told me recently. “I want our researchers to post abstracts, posters, and a brief audio file into Socialtext. Before, during or after a research event, research staff and management can then ask questions and learn more about a particular area of research, using the ‘comment’ feature. So if someone in one office or time zone happened to miss out or cannot attend when the event was live, he or she can go into Socialtext and still participate in the conversation. And those that are interested in working together as a research team can use Socialtext Groups.”

    John envisions this will enhance participation and the formation of collaborative work between the various R&D sites. “It’s really great that it’ll be easier for both the authors/presenters and the attendees to learn about what’s going on and find potential research partners,” he says.

    Researchers will be encouraged to fill out their People Profiles, a social networking feature that allows them to share expertise and work activities. We think this is a really neat use of Socialtext, and we look forward to watching GM’s progress.

    About This Blog

    Weblog on gaining business results from social software.

    On this blog, Socialtext staffers and customers explore how companies can gain the most business value from their use of enterprise social software, including microblogging, social networking, filtered activity streams, widget-based dashboards, blogs and wikis.

    Search

    Find us on Facebook

    Read blogs from our team members:

    Archives

    Recent Posts

    What’s Next for Online Piracy

    Eugene Lee, January 26, 2012


    Enterprise 2.0: It’s not just for knowledge workers anymore

    Michael Idinopulos, December 9, 2011


    Turning Serendipity into Probability

    Michael Idinopulos, December 1, 2011


    Why Socialtext 360 = Success

    Mark Sylvester, November 15, 2011


    Social Training for Social Software

    Michael Idinopulos, November 1, 2011


    Socialtext 5.0

    Alan Lepofsky, October 3, 2011


    Socialtext introduces Socialtext 5 – welcome to the power, the ease and the flow of the future!

    Sarah Dulak, September 28, 2011


    CIO Insight Interview with Eugene Lee

    Britta Meyer, September 22, 2011


    Learn How the DAU Is Improving Collaboration and Education

    Alan Lepofsky, August 15, 2011


    Eugene Lee Discusses Socialtext with TMC

    Alan Lepofsky, August 11, 2011


    Recent Tweets


    Blue Man Group Webinar

    Recording Coming Soon

    Learn how Blue Man Group uses Socialtext to foster creativity among its 500 employees, how groups are working better and more effectively together and why they’ve seen an over 80% adoption rate since implementation.

    The Social Layer: Integrating Social Software with Business Applications

    Free Webcast

    In this webcast, Rob Koplowitz, VP & Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, Inc. and Vandonelio Williams, Sr. Director of IT at the NYU Stern School of Business discuss the emerging social layer phenomenon; how NYU is integrating Socialtext with applications to facilitate collaboration and connections among students, faculty and staff; and the business benefits being realized from building a social layer.