You will experience first-hand
the benefits of using Socialtext as you and your colleagues create and
share information, discover subject
matter experts, and form close relationships. Your trial
includes Socialtext Dashboard and Socialtext People.
Get your free trial
For customers that want to connect with other users like them, the Customer Exchange provides a virtual community using a wiki workspace for sharing experiences and discussing wiki use-cases and best practices.
Socialtext Exchange
Stowe Boyd recently posted the following statement:
It came in response to a post of mine about Enterprise 2.0 adoption where I wrote that:
Boyd's
drawing a really important distinction here. In our daily lives, we are
all members of various groups: our families, neighborhoods, church
groups, ethnic groups, etc. Also at work, we are members of groups:
departments, business units, project teams, carpools, weekend soccer
players, etc. These are collections of people--more or less dynamic,
more or less formal--who share some common set of attributes,
activities, or interests. At the same time, we all have our personal
networks--the individuals whom we know and interact with. There is of
course a lot of overlap between a person's groups and her network; we
know many of the people in our groups. But an individual's personal
network typically spans multiple groups. My network, for example,
includes my colleagues at Socialtext, my former McKinsey colleagues, my
neighbors in Philadelphia, the other parents at my childrens' day care,
and so on.
When Boyd says that Enterprise 2.0 is about personal relationships in networks and not group membership, I think he's saying that the point of Enterprise 2.0 is not to enable existing organizational groups, but to empower and mobilize social networks for getting work done in new ways.
Who's right? I think we both are.
Boyd makes a really important point about social networks. Web 2.0 is waking us all up to how powerful it is when social networks are made transparent. From a professional standpoint, a worker's long-term career development, sense of belonging, job satisfaction, mentoring and guidance, etc., are often driven more by social networks than by formal groups. That trend will accelerate as social networking takes off in earnest within enterprises.
But it's important to recognize that the fundamental unit of collaboration is the group. Departments, divisions, business units, teams, committees, etc., are the wheels on which almost all companies run. That's not an Enterprise 1.0 or an Enterprise 2.0 thing; it's a reflection of the fact that collaboration around tasks of any size requires continuity and accountability.
This isn't an either/or thing, however. The sweet spot for Enterprise 2.0 lies at the intersection of group collaboration and social networking. As I've blogged about before, Enterprise 2.0 has business impact when it's integrated in-the-flow of everyday work. For most workers today, it's their group work that's in the flow. Social networking becomes truly valuable--and generates meaningful organizational adoption--when it's layered on top of, and appropriately integrated with group collaboration.
In the most recent 'Magic Quadrant for Team Collaboration & Social Software' from Gartner, Socialtext is positioned in the Visionaries Quadrant. Web 2.0 technologies that comprise Enterprise 2.0 have gone mainstream and enterprise clients are actively moving to select and deploy team collaboration and social software tools, including wikis.
Read
the Report
Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration
Case study of how German investment bank used Socialtext to fundamentally shift the way knowledge work is done by Andrew McAfee, Associate Professor, Harvard
Get
the Article
- Understanding what matters most to your market
- Knowing your sales tools will hit the mark
- Having competitive intelligence when and where you need it
Watch a recorded webinar