Socialtext Business Social Software - Wiki Collaboration

Get your 14 day free trial

You will experience first-hand the benefits of using Socialtext as you and your colleagues create and share information, discover subject matter experts, and form close relationships. Your trial includes Socialtext Dashboard and Socialtext People.

Get your free trial

Join the Customer Exchange

For customers that want to connect with other users like them, the Customer Exchange provides a virtual community using a wiki workspace for sharing experiences and discussing wiki use-cases and best practices.

Socialtext Exchange

Visit Blog

From The Socialtext Weblog

Groups and Networks Posted on 8 October 2008 | 1:19 pm

Stowe Boyd recently posted the following statement:

I disagree with the notion that Enterprise 2.0 is about groups not the individual. On the contrary: Web 2.0 is based on the person and personal relationships in networks, not group membership.


It came in response to a post of mine about Enterprise 2.0 adoption where I wrote that:

Enterprise 2.0 posits the group as the primary unit of activity; email posits the individual


Boyd's drawing a really important distinction here. In our daily lives, we are all members of various groups: our families, neighborhoods, church groups, ethnic groups, etc. Also at work, we are members of groups: departments, business units, project teams, carpools, weekend soccer players, etc. These are collections of people--more or less dynamic, more or less formal--who share some common set of attributes, activities, or interests. At the same time, we all have our personal networks--the individuals whom we know and interact with. There is of course a lot of overlap between a person's groups and her network; we know many of the people in our groups. But an individual's personal network typically spans multiple groups. My network, for example, includes my colleagues at Socialtext, my former McKinsey colleagues, my neighbors in Philadelphia, the other parents at my childrens' day care, and so on.

When Boyd says that Enterprise 2.0 is about personal relationships in networks and not group membership, I think he's saying that the point of Enterprise 2.0 is not to enable existing organizational groups, but to empower and mobilize social networks for getting work done in new ways.

Who's right? I think we both are.

Boyd makes a really important point about social networks. Web 2.0 is waking us all up to how powerful it is when social networks are made transparent. From a professional standpoint, a worker's long-term career development,  sense of belonging, job satisfaction, mentoring and guidance, etc., are often driven more by social networks than by formal groups. That trend will accelerate as social networking takes off in earnest within enterprises.

But it's important to recognize that the fundamental unit of collaboration is the group. Departments, divisions, business units, teams, committees, etc., are the wheels on which almost all companies run. That's not an Enterprise 1.0 or an Enterprise 2.0 thing; it's a reflection of the fact that collaboration around tasks of any size requires continuity and accountability.

This isn't an either/or thing, however. The sweet spot for Enterprise 2.0 lies at the intersection of group collaboration and social networking. As I've blogged about before, Enterprise 2.0 has business impact when it's integrated in-the-flow of everyday work. For most workers today, it's their group work that's in the flow. Social networking becomes truly valuable--and generates meaningful organizational adoption--when it's layered on top of, and appropriately integrated with group collaboration.

Plugging In to Socialtext 3.0 Posted on 3 October 2008 | 10:59 am

Because of my role working with Socialtext's partners, for me, the most exciting thing about this week's introduction of Socialtext 3.0 is the opportunity to quickly expand our partner ecosystem.

The Socialtext 3.0 platform enables our customers to choose from the over 100,000 widgets that have been developed based on the Google OpenSocial Gadget standard.  Many of these widgets provide popular extensions that are great complements to the collaboration capabilities inherent in our platform.  And, we are working with a number of new developers to create additional widgets to add to this portfolio and make available to our SMB and enterprise customers.

This activity around new Google OpenSocial development is in addition to the work being done on Socialtext connectors to other enterprise systems.  The new Socialtext People profile combines the information available in a company's LDAP or Microsoft Active Directory system with the business social networking features available with 3.0.  Socialtext is also working with its developers and partners to add to the capabilities of our connectors that integrate Socialtext 3.0 with IBM's Lotus Connections and SocialPoint which enables integration with Microsoft SharePoint.  We are working with our customers and partners to prioritize additional system integration opportunities for Socialtext 3.0, so stay tuned!

Enterprise Adoption in the World of Socialtext 3.0 Posted on 1 October 2008 | 8:21 am

Everyone who works on enterprise collaboration software knows that organizational adoption is really important, and can be hard to achieve. Yesterday's Socialtext 3.0 launch has introduced an exciting new twist. In fact, I think it has completely changed the social software adoption game--for the better.

Socialtext 3.0 is going to appeal to non-power-users, or what I call the "I don't care about the latest gadget, I just want to do my job" crowd. It's not just the smooth user experience, personalizable dashboard, and global navigation (though those things certainly help.) To my mind, the real game-changer is the integration of social networking into the Socialtext collaboration suite. Socialtext 3.0 has bridged the gap between group collaboration and social networking. That is going to have a profound impact on enterprise adoption.

Finding people within companies, especially large companies, is a killer app. On virtually every corporate intranet, the Company Directory is by far the most heavily used application. It often accounts for north of 70-80% of intranet search activity. Even your least techno-savvy colleagues understand the need to find colleagues. So it's relatively easy to get a new user to try the tools.

As new users start to use the tools, they quickly wake up to the possibilities. Public social networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn are penetrating the mainstream over-30 crowd at a surprising rate. More and more people are realizing that looking a person up in the phone book is only one way to find her. Best of all, it's fun and addictive.

Once people try it, social networking has a unique ability to jump across organizational silos. Blogs and wikis led the charge of social software into the enterprise world. Those forms of collaboration are wonderful, but they can be difficult to scale beyond the department level. Individual teams and groups derive tremendous value from using blogs and wikis in the flow of their daily work. But the thing about daily workflows is that they tend to center around a defined group of members and business process. Even when one group is rockin' and rollin' on blogs and wikis, moving to another group within the same company can be a challenge. Each new department or team is a brand new adoption curve.

Harvard Business School Professor Andrew McAfee has blogged insightfully that social networking's strength is the way in which it discovers, utilizes, and reinforces weak ties across a distributed social network. In an enterprise context, that means that social networking allows people to identify and connect to colleagues outside the usual suspects. Since those colleagues are almost always in a different group, department, team, business unit, etc., social networking has a natural ability to span across organizational silos more easily than other social software applications.

Because of the way Socialtext has integrated social networking with group workspaces, social networking adoption triggers adoption in other areas as well. The actions of my colleagues in Socialtext People automatically directs my attention to the workspaces they're working in. That pulls me into conversations and documents that are new to me, and reinforces my use of other parts of the collaboration suite.

From an adoption standpoint, this is a whole new world.

What's New

Enterprise 2.0 Leadership

GartnerIn the most recent 'Magic Quadrant for Team Collaboration & Social Software' from Gartner, Socialtext is positioned in the Visionaries Quadrant. Web 2.0 technologies that comprise Enterprise 2.0 have gone mainstream and enterprise clients are actively moving to select and deploy team collaboration and social software tools, including wikis.
Read the Report

Free Article Download from MIT Sloan Management Review

Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration
Case study of how German investment bank used Socialtext to fundamentally shift the way knowledge work is done by Andrew McAfee, Associate Professor, Harvard

Get the Article

Imagine always...

- Understanding what matters most to your market
- Knowing your sales tools will hit the mark
- Having competitive intelligence when and where you need it

Watch a recorded webinar

Socialtext Customers

socialtext customers